Car dealers win case against customer over unjustified fraud reviews
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2025:4056
Case Details
- Date
- 31 March 2025
- Court
- Rechtbank Rotterdam
- Case Number
- C/10/694403 / KG ZA 25-141
- Outcome
- Partially Granted
Expert Analysis
A dissatisfied customer who bought three problematic cars posted multiple negative reviews accusing car dealers of fraud and deception. The court ruled one review was legitimate due to justified dissatisfaction, but other reviews were unlawful as fraud allegations were insufficiently substantiated.
Court Reasoning
- •Allegations of fraud and deception were not sufficiently substantiated with facts
- •One review was deemed legitimate due to justified dissatisfaction with delivered cars
- •Companies' right to honor and reputation outweighed freedom of expression
Key Takeaways
- •Negative reviews about poor service can be legitimate, but unsubstantiated fraud allegations cross the line into unlawful defamation
- •Courts balance freedom of expression against business reputation protection on case-by-case basis
- •Customer dissatisfaction alone does not justify making serious accusations like fraud without factual basis
Significance
Demonstrates the boundary between legitimate customer criticism and unlawful defamation in online reviews, particularly regarding serious accusations like fraud.
Practical Implications
Businesses can seek removal of defamatory reviews containing unsubstantiated fraud allegations, while customers retain right to express justified complaints factually.
Legal Basis
Parties
- Plaintiff:
- Two car dealership companies - one selling cars, one providing financing
- Defendant:
- Self-employed entrepreneur who bought three problematic vehicles
Need help with a similar case?
EssentialWhen you submit a request through us, you receive free access to Reptor.ai Essential during the handling of your case plus 30 days afterward. Monitor your online reputation in real-time.